Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
81. Solo PVP Carrier - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
i have solo'd in a carrier.....i died, the carrier was litterally a sitting duck because of 2 griffins sitting 80km away jamming my fighters, it was pointless undocking it tbh
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.21 15:32:45
|
82. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vokan Narkar wrote: Lan Wang wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: but i really shouldnt complain about you buffing gatecamping. It doesnt buff gatecamps. Just removes jumping over them in LS. it does because all i simply ...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 23:43:46
|
83. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: sero Hita wrote: But you can also do it by killing the gatecamp with a cyno, which is more pirate like. How about we agree upon some artistic freedom to do what we want? Cyno drop of caps is pirate like? In LS? First...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 23:16:59
|
84. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: cynos and caps are allowed in lowsec, Protip: Check the topic of the thread. i have and people from lowsec and nullsec have given reasons why cynos and caps are in lowsec, dont bother asking for th...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 23:09:30
|
85. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
salvos, cynos and caps are allowed in lowsec, telling us to fck off to nullsec every 10minutes isnt going work just makes you sound like a spoiled little child, you sound like a total entitled prick yourself. if you have such an issue with us bein...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 22:51:09
|
86. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: this is what happens when carebears get stupid ideas about pvp mechanics No, this is what happens when entitled pricks get so full of their own crap, they cant tell what is what anymore. Wtf are you e...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 22:24:39
|
87. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
this is what happens when carebears get stupid ideas about pvp mechanics
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 22:01:23
|
88. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: fml, fine buff gatecamps, im good with that, i dont need to worry about people dropping me in tama anymore, gg well done 1) It doesnt buff gatecamps. Nothing changes for gatecamps. 2) Good, now you beg...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 21:28:25
|
89. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: sero Hita wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: but i really shouldnt complain about you buffing gatecamping. It doesnt buff gatecamps. Just removes jumping over them in LS. Salvos, you are not underst...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 21:20:57
|
90. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
we are in lowsec because we dont like nullsec, how hard is that for you to understand? the current mechanics in lowsec allow for a range of different gameplay options and logistics is easier for people who dont want to rely on using huge logistics...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 21:10:05
|
91. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: but i really shouldnt complain about you buffing gatecamping. It doesnt buff gatecamps. Just removes jumping over them in LS. it does because all i simply need to do is put scouts in each surroundi...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 19:25:49
|
92. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: cyno's are litterally the only way to get ships into a system which has an organised gatecamp with scouts in every surrounding system looking for hostile fleets Wrong. Cynos bypass the gatecamp(s) ent...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 19:14:54
|
93. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
cyno's are litterally the only way to get ships into a system which has an organised gatecamp with scouts in every surrounding system looking for hostile fleets
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 19:06:13
|
94. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: You dont need LS, and LS doesnt need you. Fk off to NS where you belong. looks pretty aggressive so maybe take your own advice HTFU, meat-puppet s...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 18:59:48
|
95. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: 1. stop calling them smartbombs, makes you sound uneducated as they are very much allowed in lowsec 2. you got aggressive about me not "addressing" your comment, which i did, now have the curtosy to addr...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 18:45:49
|
96. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. stop calling them smartbombs, makes you sound uneducated as they are very much allowed in lowsec 2. you got aggressive about me not "addressing" your comment, which i did, now have the curtosy to address the questions i asked you. lowsec does...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 18:40:34
|
97. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Lan Wang wrote: We will continue to play with our caps in lowsec like the game allows us to, you think they dont belong there but ccp disagrees otherwise they wouldnt be there, ok? Sure, go ahead and play. That doesn...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 18:27:29
|
98. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We will continue to play with our caps in lowsec like the game allows us to, you think they dont belong there but ccp disagrees otherwise they wouldnt be there, ok?
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 18:17:55
|
99. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
MoonDragn wrote: So what you guys are basically saying is that you feel that you should be able to destroy ships that are worth billions of isk with a little bubble and smart bombs that cost a tiny percentage of that amount? wut?
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 15:48:13
|
100. Low-sec Hopes and Changes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: stuff Ok ill address this for you. You agreed LS will do fine without cynos/caps, and then gave an example of how an LS mega-coalition forced you to displace with CAPS (which almost certainly had NS based reinforcement...
- by Lan Wang - at 2017.03.20 15:22:52
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |